Our everyday use of race and gender often assumes they are fixed traits, as stable as height or eye colour. Yet the more closely we look, the more these categories show signs of being shaped by human decisions. Physical differences exist, but the ways we divide, name, and value them are deeply influenced by history, politics, and culture.

Treating these categories as natural can hide the work they do. Racial divisions have been drawn in different ways in different times and places, reflecting the needs and prejudices of those in power. Gender, too, has been defined in ways that link bodies to social roles, prescribing behaviour and limiting opportunity. Once embedded in law and custom, these definitions feel solid, even inevitable, but they are built structures.

This does not mean that race and gender are unreal. They are real in the way that money or citizenship is real: their power comes from collective recognition and enforcement. They shape lives, open and close doors, and carry heavy emotional and political weight. That reality makes it vital to ask whether the categories we use still serve the values we claim to hold.

Philosophy’s role is to expose the scaffolding. It asks us to see race and gender not as neutral descriptions, but as tools that can be redesigned. Such work requires care. Erasing a category without addressing the inequalities it has supported can simply hide injustice rather than remove it. Rebuilding categories to be more inclusive, or questioning the need for them altogether, can make room for forms of identity and community that are currently sidelined.

If race and gender are, in part, what we make them, then changing them is possible. The challenge is deciding what we want them to do, and whether the versions we live with now match that aim.

‍